TNA at a Crossroads: Rebuild, Rebrand, or Be Replaced?
Read Time:3 Minute, 36 Second
TNA Wrestling finds itself in a strange, transitional phase. For the first time in many years, the promotion isn’t constantly rumored to be on the brink of collapse. Since Anthem Sports & Entertainment acquired the company in 2017, the narrative around TNA has shifted from survival to sustainability.
Anthem’s backing provided much-needed financial stability and secured a consistent home on television with AXS TV. Yet, despite that foundation, the company stands at a crossroads, with its future hanging in the balance.
The Talent Drain: A Changing Identity
Over the past few years, TNA has lost a significant portion of its core roster—wrestlers who had come to define the promotion. Josh Alexander, “Speedball” Mike Bailey, the Motor City Machine Guns, Ace Austin, Jordynne Grace, Sami Callihan, and Deonna Purrazzo have all moved on. These weren’t just names on the roster—they were the cornerstones of the product, widely seen as the heart and soul of modern TNA.
Even more concerning are the behind-the-scenes departures. Influential figures like Gail Kim, Scott D’Amore, and Ariel Shnerer—who played key roles in TNA’s recent growth and creative direction—have also left the company. This kind of brain drain can be just as destabilizing as losing top-tier talent in the ring.
Wrestling’s Shrinking Middle Class
TNA is no longer a major player in the free agent market. In a wrestling landscape increasingly dominated by WWE and AEW, the company struggles to retain or attract top talent. Instead, it has turned to a developmental-adjacent strategy, bolstered by its working relationship with WWE. Through this partnership, TNA gains access to promising young talent without the financial commitment of long-term contracts. While this strategy helps fill out a thinning roster, it also dilutes the uniqueness of the product and contributes to a revolving-door feeling that makes long-term storytelling difficult.
One of the more polarizing moves by TNA is its apparent decision to position Joe Hendry as the face of the promotion. While Hendry has undeniable charisma and internet meme appeal, reactions are mixed. To some, he’s a one-note gimmick. To others, a potential breakout star. Betting the company’s fortunes on such a divisive figure could either reinvigorate TNA or accelerate its irrelevance.
The TV Deal Question
Another key issue on the horizon is the company’s future television deal. A solid TV contract could, in theory, elevate TNA back into the national spotlight as a legitimate No. 3 promotion. However, that possibility seems remote given current metrics. TNA’s weekly ratings and pay-per-view buys remain modest, and competition for broadcast deals is fierce. Even Tony Khan, despite AEW’s success, has struggled to secure meaningful TV time for Ring of Honor. The NWA has faced similar challenges.
TNA’s historical baggage doesn’t help either. Many television executives still remember the Spike TV debacle and the Vince Russo controversy—a PR nightmare that continues to cast a long shadow.
The WWE Option: Merger or Assimilation?
With WWE’s renewed focus on global localization—highlighted by their acquisition of AAA in Mexico and stated ambitions to expand further into Europe—some speculate that TNA might eventually be absorbed into WWE’s growing portfolio. Rumors of such a move have persisted for years, but now they seem more plausible than ever. For WWE, acquiring TNA could provide valuable tape libraries, another developmental brand, or even just a means to consolidate the market further.
The Vanishing Middle Ground
For now, TNA occupies an awkward space in the industry… They are too small to compete with WWE or AEW, but too big to be considered a true indie promotion. If the company fails to reassert its identity and rebuild its talent infrastructure, it risks becoming obsolete—or simply another acquisition in WWE’s expansion plans.
The real concern isn’t just for TNA as a brand, but for professional wrestling as a whole. With fewer mid-tier promotions offering consistent paychecks, wrestlers are left with dwindling options between local indies and the corporate juggernauts. TNA’s fate could be emblematic of a broader contraction in the wrestling industry. One where fewer players dominate more territory, and the room for innovation and alternative voices shrinks.
What are your thoughts on TNA? Let us know in the comments below!
Happy
36 %
Sad
9 %
Excited
9 %
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
36 %
Surprise
9 %
About Post Author
